Skip to content
— The Landscape

AI breaches in 2025 weren't random. They had patterns.

The 2025 IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report studied 600 organizations globally. Across the incidents involving AI systems, eight failure modes showed up again and again — patterns so consistent they can be used as a readiness framework. This diagnostic scores your program against all eight.

01 · Access & Identity

AI access controls

97% of AI-breach victims in 2025 lacked proper access controls for their AI systems.

02 · Policy & Oversight

Governance policy maturity

63% of organizations had no AI governance policy, or one still in draft.

03 · Visibility

Shadow AI exposure

$670K higher breach cost when shadow AI was involved, with 10 additional days of dwell time.

04 · Third-Party Risk

AI supply-chain exposure

60% of AI supply-chain breaches led to data compromise; 31% caused operational disruption.

05 · Data Sensitivity

Sensitive data flowing to AI

53% of AI-related breaches exposed customer PII. Shadow AI incidents were worst for IP and PII loss.

06 · Autonomy

AI agent identity & credentials

Agents with unaudited credentials are among the fastest-growing AI attack surfaces flagged in the 2025 research.

07 · Readiness

Incident response readiness

Tested IR plans saved an average of $248K per breach — but most orgs don't have one for AI-specific incidents.

08 · Regulatory

High-stakes AI decisions

EU AI Act Annex III enforcement begins 2 August 2026. NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 define parallel obligations.

Sources: IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2025 (Ponemon Institute, 600 organizations) · EU AI Act Annex III · NIST AI RMF · ISO/IEC 42001

 
— What You Get

In 4 minutes, a clear picture of where your AI program is exposed.

No email required to see your results. What you walk away with:

01 · Your Posture

A 0–100 posture score, bucketed four ways

Resilient · Hardening · At Risk · Exposed. A quick way to align the room on where you actually are, not where you hope you are.

02 · Your Gaps

Your top 3 gaps, each with IBM 2025 research

Not generic advice. The specific failure modes most likely to be tested in your environment first, with the data behind each.

03 · Your Next Step

A recommended first engagement, matched to your gaps

Inventory baseline, shadow-AI readiness, detection engineering, model validation, or regulatory prep — the one that fits your specific posture.

8 questions ~4 minutes No email required Shareable results
Start below ↓
8-question diagnostic

How exposed is your AI stack, really?

Eight questions, about four minutes. You'll get a risk posture, your three highest-priority gaps with industry evidence, and a recommended next step — no email required to see your results.

What this assessment measures

Each question targets a failure mode that correlated with actual AI breaches in the IBM 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report — AI access controls, governance maturity, shadow AI visibility, supply-chain exposure, data sensitivity, agent identity hygiene, incident readiness, and regulated decision-making. The scoring is backed by industry data, not intuition.

Your risk posture

Scoring is based on correlates of actual AI-related breaches in IBM's 2025 research. A posture score is not a prediction — it flags where your program is most likely to be tested first.

/ 100

Your top priority gaps

Recommended next step

Duration: Starts with:

Request advisory services →
 

— Get Started

Elevate and protect
your business today.

See what's already happening inside your AI environment — before someone else does.